Posted by Christine Baker on August 04, 1997 at 17:22:18:
Dear Max: http://www.experian.com/corporate/max/maxmail.html
I just had a look at the Experian (TRW) sample report on your web site.
1) The entire report is written in all CAPS.
That's consistent with DISCLOSURES and other important documents which the authors DON'T want you to read.
I'm disabled, only with great difficulty can I read an entire paragraph in all CAPS. I have asked many of my friends and clients about their all CAPS reading (dis)ability. Most are just as disabled as I am.
I have attended many closings. I don't think I've ever had a client read an all CAPS document or paragraph.
I suspect Experian (TRW) is purposely making it as difficult as possible to read their reports. When you can't read it, you won't dispute it.
Max, I'd like to get a report I can read. Can we arrange that?
2) Last time I got my own TRW directly from you it was thirteen (13) all CAPS pages long. Compare that to CBI's 2 page easy to read report.
TRW claims their reports are consumer friendly, written in "plain language."
Most consumers, especially those with lots of accounts won't bother to read it, or, due to their reading disability, will not comprehend the data and miss incorrect reporting.
At the very least, Experian (TRW) should offer consumers with the all CAPS reading disability the CBI style comprehensive easy to read (for me) column format.
It takes me just a few minutes to analyze the average CBI report. When a client wants me to review their TRW report, I charge by the hour. Fortunately, almost all my clients have me order their reports. No business would read a 13-page report, my reports are merged and VERY easy to read. But when it comes to reviewing the results of consumer's disputes, we don't have a choice.
Or do we? Max, can we request a consumer credit report and your results to consumer disputes without all the blablabla, a report that's well organized and is as easy to read as the CBI report?
3) Is Experian (TRW) still reporting a paid mortgage with an NOD (notice of default) as a "Paid foreclosure?"
In 1996 I had clients who were declined a new loan because of the incorrect TRW reporting. The loan had been brought current by the borrowers prior to the sale. The property was NEVER foreclosed on.
TRW refused to change the reporting. I was told that all paid mortgages which had a NOD at anytime are reported as "paid foreclosure" once the loan is paid off.
Anyone looking at a report with a "paid foreclosure" will assume that the property was foreclosed on and the loan was paid with the proceeds from the foreclosure sale. Since this is entirely incorrect, I would think that my clients would be able to sue TRW for slander.
I'm looking forward to Max's response.
Christine Baker