X-Persona: <BayHouse>
From: GOSTLDY@aol.com
Delivered-To: bayhouse.com-FNMA-fraud@bayhouse.com
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 01:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: FNMA-fraud@bayhouse.com
Subject: your libelous publication

Dear Ms. Baker:

Please retract your libelous statements about me in the same manner in
which you have published them.
from our conversation last week it was quite evident to me that you
had absolutely no idea of what a preliminary injunction is, and what is
required under California law for one to issue. In order for a judge to issue
a preliminary injunction, in this case keeping Cindi in possession of the
house pending the final trial on the merits of the case, the plaintiff must
show a likely that she will ultimately prevail in the action.There was
nothing improper about Judge Wade doing his own accounting of Cindi's payments
and how they were applied. In fact, it was quite commendable of him to do
so.

It was also quite apparent to me and to all present that Judge Wade did not
want to remove or keep Cindi out of the house.However, he believed that
it would have been unlawful for him to have granted the preliminary
injunction, because he believed that Cindi would ultimately prevail
in her lawsuit.

I will be looking for your immediate retraction in this matter, as same will
most likely immunize you from a libel lawsuit by me against you, and
anyone else responsible for falsehoods published by you in this webpage.

                                     Jerry l. Steering  5/27/97

My immediate reply to Cindi's fired Jerry l. Steering:  Sue me :)

6/11/05:  I hope Jerry Steering  has since been disbarred.